Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531901›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior2023

Community-oriented Motivational Interviewing (MI): A novel framework extending MI to address COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in online social media platforms.

David Scales, Jack M Gorman, Peter DiCaprio, Lindsay Hurth, Malavika Radhakrishnan, Savannah Windham, Azubuike Akunne, Julia Florman, Lindsey Leininger, Tyrel J Starks

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Collective efficacy: A protective factor for sexual minority men during the U.S. mpox outbreak.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David ScalesSection of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jack M GormanCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Peter DiCaprioCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Lindsay HurthCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Malavika RadhakrishnanCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Savannah WindhamCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Azubuike AkunneCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Julia FlormanCritica, Bronx, NY, USA.
Lindsey LeiningerTuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Tyrel J StarksDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
The Bronx Defenders · USCornell University · USDartmouth College · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have linked circulating misinformation in online platforms to low COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Two disparate literatures provide relevant initial guidance to address the problem. Motivational Interviewing (MI) effectively reduces vaccine hesitancy in clinical environments; meanwhile, social scientists note inoculation, rebuttal, and appeals to accuracy are persuasive in digital contexts. A tension is inherent in these approaches. MI in digital forums may induce an 'illusory truth effect,' wherein falsehoods appear more accurate through repetition. Yet, rebutting misinformation directly may elicit backfire or reactance effects, motivating some to amplify their presentation of misinformation. Building on Identity Process Theory, we propose a theoretical framework for conducting MI-based infodemiology interventions among digital communities that conceptualizes the community in toto (rather than one specific person) as the unit of focus. Case examples from interventions on public Facebook posts illustrate three processes unique to such interventions: 1) Navigating tension between addressing commenters and "bystanders"; 2) Activating pro-vaccine bystanders; and 3) Reframing uncertainty or information individuals might find concerning or threatening according to implied collective values. This paper suggests community-oriented MI can maximize persuasive effects on bystanders while minimizing potential reactance from those with committed beliefs, thereby guiding community-oriented public health messaging interventions enacted in digital environments.

Indexed as

BystanderDigital information environmentIdentity process theoryInfodemiologyMotivational interviewingPsychological reactanceVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36531901
PMCPMC9745298
OpenAlexW4311236122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.