Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531842›Full record

ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2023

Utility of tPA Administration in Acute Treatment of Internal Carotid Artery Occlusions.

Kavit Shah, Keiko A Fukuda, Shashvat M Desai, Bradley A Gross, Ashutosh P Jadhav

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kavit ShahVascular and Endovascular Neurology, Aurora Neuroscience Innovation Institute, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53215, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-8224
Keiko A FukudaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shashvat M DesaiDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Bradley A GrossDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashutosh P JadhavDepartments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ , USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USAurora St. Luke's Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) remains part of the guidelines for acute ischemic stroke treatment, yet internal carotid artery occlusions (ICAO) are known to be poorly responsive to IV-tPA. It is unknown whether bridging thrombolysis (BT) is beneficial in such cases. Purpose: We sought to evaluate whether the use of IV-tPA improved overall clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for ICA occlusions. Methods: Data from 1367 consecutive stroke cases treated with EVT from 2012-2019 were prospectively collected from a single center. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between IV-tPA administration and clinical outcome. Results: 153 patients were found to have carotid terminus and tandem ICAO who received EVT and presented within 4.5h of last seen well. 50% (n = 82) received IV tPA. There were no differences between the groups with respect to age, NIHSS, time to EVT and ASPECTS score. 53% had tandem ICA-MCA occlusions. Rate of recanalization (≥ TICI 2B) and sICH did not significantly differ between the two groups. Regression analysis demonstrated no effect of IV-tPA on modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days and overall mortality. Factors significantly associated with reduced mortality included lower age, lower NIHSS, and better rate of recanalization. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes in those receiving BT vs. direct EVT for ICAO. For centers with optimal door-to-puncture times, bypassing IV-tPA may expedite recanalization times and potentially yield more favorable outcomes. Patients with higher NIHSS and tandem lesions may have better outcomes with BT.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokecarotid occlusionthrombectomythrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID36531842
PMCPMC9755621
OpenAlexW4303953730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.