ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Median nerve stimulation elevates ventricular fibrillation threshold
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Median nerve stimulation (MNS) diminishes regional myocardial ischemia and ventricular arrhythmia; however, the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. Methods: In this study, we randomly categorized 22 adult mongrel dogs into a control group, MNS group 1, and MNS group 2. After a 4-week experimental myocardial infarction (MI), ventricular electrophysiology was measured in the MNS group 1 before and after 30 min of MNS. The same measurements were performed in the MNS group 2 dogs Results: No significant changes were reported in the ventricular effective refractory period (ERP) in the MNS group 1 and MNS group 2 dogs before and after MNS. The ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) in the MNS group 1 was significantly higher than that in the MNS group 2 (20.3 ± 3.7 V vs. 8.7 ± 2.9 V, Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MNS increases VFT in a canine model with MI. The effects of MNS on VFT are potentially associated with the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.