Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531715›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Development and validation of a novel risk model for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence risk among paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients after the first catheter ablation.

Guangling Li, Xiaomei Wang, Jing-Jing Han, Xueya Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a systematic review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guangling LiLanzhou University Second Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xiaomei WangLanzhou University Second Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Jing-Jing HanDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xueya GuoDepartment of Cardiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Lanzhou University · CNLanzhou University Second Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Several models have been developed to predict the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). However, these models are of poor quality from the start. We, therefore, aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for post-operative recurrence of AF. Materials and methods: In a study including 433 patients undergoing the first circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) procedure, independent predictors of AF recurrence were retrospectively identified. Using the Cox regression of designated variables, a risk model was developed in a random sample of 70% of the patients (development cohort) and validated in the remaining (validation cohort) 30%. The accuracy and discriminative power of the predictive models were evaluated in both cohorts. Results: During the established 12 months follow-up, 134 patients (31%) recurred. Six variables were identified in the model including age, coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), hypertension, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and left atrial diameter (LAD). The model showed good discriminative power in the development cohort, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.86). Furthermore, the model shows good agreement between actual and predicted probabilities in the calibration curve. The above results were confirmed in the validation cohort. Meanwhile, decision curve analysis (DCA) for this model also demonstrates the advantages of clinical application. Conclusion: A simple risk model to predict AF recurrence after ablation was developed and validated, showing good discriminative power and calibration.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationatrial fibrillation recurrenceprediction modelradiofrequency catheter ablationrecurrence risk

Identifiers

PMID36531715
PMCPMC9755330
OpenAlexW4311093753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.