ArticleOphthalmology science2022
OCT-Derived Radiomic Features Predict Anti-VEGF Response and Durability in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomics in ophthalmology: a systematic review.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of retinal fluid volume dynamics in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and association with vision and atrophy.Eye (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Texture-Based Radiomic SD-OCT Features Associated With Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy in a Phase III Neovascular AMD Clinical Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- Genetic factors associated with response to as-needed brolucizumab treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Radiomics after Cataract Surgery: Effects of Media Opacity, Signal Strength, and Region of Interest Selection.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2026Article
- Radiomic Characterization and Automated Classification of Drusen Substructure Phenotype Associated with High-Risk Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Early optical coherence tomography biomarkers for tailored frequency of intravitreal aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-exudative OCT findings in neovascular AMD.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Validation of Inter-Reader Agreement/Consistency for Quantification of Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Sub-RPE Compartmental Features Across Retinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Radiomics-Based Prediction of Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Pigment Epithelial Detachment.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Novel Fractal-Based Sub-RPE Compartment OCT Radiomics Biomarkers Are Associated With Subfoveal Geographic Atrophy in Dry AMD.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: No established biomarkers currently exist for therapeutic efficacy and durability of anti-VEGF therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study evaluated radiomic-based quantitative OCT biomarkers that may be predictive of anti-VEGF treatment response and durability. Design: Assessment of baseline biomarkers using machine learning (ML) classifiers to predict tolerance to anti-VEGF therapy. Participants: Eighty-one participants with treatment-naïve nAMD from the OSPREY study, including 15 super responders (patients who achieved and maintained retinal fluid resolution) and 66 non-super responders (patients who did not achieve or maintain retinal fluid resolution). Methods: A total of 962 texture-based radiomic features were extracted from fluid, subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM), and different retinal tissue compartments of OCT scans. The top 8 features, chosen by the minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection method, were evaluated using 4 ML classifiers in a cross-validated approach to distinguish between the 2 patient groups. Longitudinal assessment of changes in different texture-based radiomic descriptors (delta-texture features) between baseline and month 3 also was performed to evaluate their association with treatment response. Additionally, 8 baseline clinical parameters and a combination of baseline OCT, delta-texture features, and the clinical parameters were evaluated in a cross-validated approach in terms of association with therapeutic response. Main Outcome Measures: The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to validate the classifier performance. Results: The cross-validated AUC by the quadratic discriminant analysis classifier was 0.75 ± 0.09 using texture-based baseline OCT features. The delta-texture features within different OCT compartments between baseline and month 3 yielded an AUC of 0.78 ± 0.08. The baseline clinical parameters sub-retinal pigment epithelium volume and intraretinal fluid volume yielded an AUC of 0.62 ± 0.07. When all the baseline, delta, and clinical features were combined, a statistically significant improvement in the classifier performance (AUC, 0.81 ± 0.07) was obtained. Conclusions: Radiomic-based quantitative assessment of OCT images was shown to distinguish between super responders and non-super responders to anti-VEGF therapy in nAMD. The baseline fluid and SHRM delta-texture features were found to be most discriminating across groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.