Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531566›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022

The Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Clinical Characterization of

Anon Paichitrojjana, Thep Chalermchai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Is Acne the Same Around the World?The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anon PaichitrojjanaSchool of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6522-6586
Thep ChalermchaiSchool of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-7835
Mae Fah Luang University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The clinical presentation of Materials and Methods: Three hundred twenty new acne patients were questioned regarding general information, including age, sex, itchy symptoms, and past treatment history with antibiotics and steroids within four weeks. Clinical presentations of AV (location and severity), dandruff, and seborrheic dermatitis were examined by a dermatologist. Cytologic studies to determine the abnormal proliferation of Results: The prevalence of MF in patients clinically diagnosed with AV was 28.8% (95% Confidence interval: CI = 23.8% - 33.7%), which can be classified as 24.7% were AV with MF and the remaining 4.1% were MF only. This study revealed that patients diagnosed with MF were 7.38 times more likely to have itchy symptoms than patients diagnosed with AV. MF patients had 8.89 times and 9.17 times higher risk of acneiform lesions on the scalp/ hairline and upper back than those who did not have MF, respectively. Conclusion: This present study revealed a high prevalence of MF in patients clinically diagnosed with AV. Dermatologists should be aware of MF when encountering AV patients with acneiform lesions on the scalp/ hairline and upper back with pruritus. Diagnosis based on clinical presentations alone may lead to misdiagnosis. Methylene blue staining is easy to perform and beneficial to diagnose MF.

Indexed as

acne vulgarisMalassezia folliculitismethylene bluePityrosporum folliculitisyeast

Identifiers

PMID36531566
PMCPMC9749417
OpenAlexW4311132757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.