Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531499›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Genetic and phenotypic differences between sexes in congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH): Large cohort analysis from a single tertiary centre.

Silvia Federici, Biagio Cangiano, Giovanni Goggi, Dario Messetti, Elisabetta Veronica Munari, Myriam Amer, Luca Giovanelli, Faris Hrvat, Valeria Vezzoli, Luca Persani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. [Genetic variants analysis of 17 female patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia FedericiDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Biagio CangianoDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni GoggiDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Dario MessettiDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta Veronica MunariDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Myriam AmerDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Luca GiovanelliDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Faris HrvatDept. of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases and Lab. of Endocrine and Metabolic Research, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Valeria VezzoliDept. of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases and Lab. of Endocrine and Metabolic Research, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Luca PersaniDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco BonomiDept. of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a condition with a strong genetic background, caused by a deficient production, secretion, or action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Published data on CHH cohorts indicate a male predominance, although this is not supported by our current understandings. Aims: In order to unravel the possible causes or contributors to such epidemiological sex difference, the aim of our study is to investigate differences in genetic background and clinical presentation between males and females in a large cohort of CHH patients. Materials and methods: We enrolled 338 CHH patients with absent or arrested pubertal development, referred to our Center from 01/2016. Data collection included clinical assessment at diagnosis and genetic analysis performed by next generation sequencing (NGS), employing a custom panel of 28 candidate genes. Results: Among 338 patients 94 were female (F) and 244 male (M), with a ratio of 1:2.6. We found that 36.09% (122/338) of patients harbored potentially pathogenic rare genetic variants (RVs) with no significant differences between sexes; on the other hand, a significantly higher frequency of oligogenicity was observed in females (F 9,57% 9/94 vs M 3,69% 9/244, Conclusion: Our data confirm the male predominance in CHH and identify some differences with regard to the clinical presentation between males and females that could indicate a variable expression of genetic rare variants and a dimorphic modulation of phenotype according to metabolic/behavioral factors, which will need to be substantiated and investigated by further studies.

Indexed as

HypogonadismCohort StudiesFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePhenotypeGonadotropin-Releasing Hormonecongenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH)femalegeneticsGnRH (gonadotropin releasing hormone)phenotype [mesh]sex

Identifiers

PMID36531499
PMCPMC9755160
OpenAlexW4311195204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.