Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531468›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Is the visceral adiposity index a potential indicator for the risk of kidney stones?

Bingbing Hou, Xudong Shen, Qiushi He, Yang Chen, Yuexian Xu, Mingwei Chen, Junhua Xi, Zongyao Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Impact of Visceral Adiposity on Testosterone Levels in American Adult Men: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bingbing HouDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xudong ShenDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qiushi HeDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yuexian XuDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Mingwei ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Junhua XiDepartment of Urology, the Second People's Hospital of Hefei (Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University), Hefei, China.
Zongyao HaoDepartment of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the visceral adiposity index (VAI) was linked to the risk of kidney stones (KS) in the representative U.S. adults. Methods: We investigated 59842 participants who joined the 2007-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The association between the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and KS was identified by logistic regression analysis. Meanwhile, the subgroup analysis as well as the calculation of dose-response curves were also utilized to identify sensitive groups. Results: Data from 29384 participants were available, including 2781 self-reported ever experiencing KS diseases. Overall, the VAI was 0.74 (0.70, 0.78) in the KS group, while 0.55 (0.52, 0.57) in the control group. After adjusting for confounders, the prevalence of KS increased by 13% for each unit of VAI increment (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.19). Moreover, a linear relationship was found between the VAI and the prevalence of KS. By subgroup analysis, we found that a positive correlation between VAI and the risk of KS both in male (OR=1.14, 95%CI:1.07, 1.22) and female (OR=1.14, 95%CI:1.05, 1.24), White (OR=1.20, 95%CI:1.11, 1.28) and other race, all aged subgroups, nonhypertensive (OR=1.06, 95%CI:1.08, 1.25) and nondiabetic subgroups (OR=1.14, 95%CI:1.07, 1.21). Conclusions: Elevated VAI was strongly associated with KS in representative U.S. adults, which may be a promising indicator for the risk of kidney stones.

Indexed as

AdiposityKidney CalculiAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleNutrition SurveysObesity, Abdominalkidney stonesNHANESobesityrisk factorsvisceral adiposity index

Identifiers

PMID36531468
PMCPMC9751392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.