ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022
New methods for the diagnosis and monitoring of cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The intellectual landscape of cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes: knowledge structure, research focuses and rising trends.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Diabetes-Associated Cognitive Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Molecular Mechanisms, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- The performance of a novel, diabetes-specific cognitive screening tool against the MoCA in older adults with type 2 diabetes.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Integrated cortical-cognitive signatures identified by machine learning enable early detection of MCI in type 2 diabetes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood heat shock protein 27 correlates with information processing speed and executive function, potentially serving as a marker for mild cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Article
- A Narrative Review on Cognitive Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes: Global Trends and Diagnostic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Association between glycated hemoglobin A1c levels, control status, and cognitive function in type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Retinal Microperimetry as a Novel Tool for Early Detection of Subclinical Cognitive Dysfunction and Brain Damage in Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Observational
- The Diabetic Cognitive Impairment Score for Early Screening of Cognitive Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Journal of diabetes research · 2025Article
- Heat shock protein 90α may serve as a biomarker for mild cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without diabetic nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- Structural and Functional Retinal Changes in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment with and without Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of type 2 diabetes acts as an accelerator of cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and later dementia), with a significant impact on the management of the disease and its complications. Therefore, it is recommended to perform an annual evaluation of cognitive function in patients with diabetes older than 65 years. Current guidelines still recommend the use of the Minimental State Evaluation Test (MMSE) as screening test, but it has a modest sensitivity and specificity for identifying mild cognitive impairment. This represents an important gap because patients with mild cognitive impairment are at risk of progressing to dementia. The neurocognitive diagnosis is based on complex neuropsychological tests, which require specifically trained personnel and are time consuming, making its routine incorporation into daily clinical practice unfeasible. Therefore, at present there are no reliable biomarkers to identify patients with type 2 diabetes at increased risk of developing cognitive impairment. Since the brain and the retina have a common embryological origin, our Research Group, has worked over the last 10 years evaluating the usefulness of the retina as a "window" to the brain. We provided evidence that retinal microperimetry is a simple, feasible and useful tool for screening and monitoring cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes. We propose a review of actual tests recommended for screening of cognitive impairment as well as an update of new emerging methods, such as retinal microperimetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.