Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531433›Full record

ArticleEye and brain2022

Neuroplasticity of the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus in Response to Retinal Gene Therapy in a Group of Patients with

Manzar Ashtari, Mikhail Lipin, Michelle Duong, Gui-Shuang Ying, Yinxi Yu, Albert Maguire, Jean Bennett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye and brain, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manzar AshtariDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7723-5527
Mikhail LipinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michelle DuongEmergency Department, Mainline Health, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA.
Gui-Shuang YingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Preventative Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yinxi YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Preventative Ophthalmology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3820-1257
Albert MaguireDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jean BennettDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USBryn Mawr Hospital · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CLAIRE H MITCHELL · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Previous works on experience-dependent brain plasticity have been limited to the cortical structures, overlooking subcortical visual structures such as the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Animal studies have shown substantial experience dependent plasticity and using fMRI, human studies have demonstrated similar properties in patients with cataract surgery. However, in neither animal nor human studies LGN has not been directly assessed, mainly due to its small size, tissue heterogeneity, low contrast/noise ratio, and low spatial resolution. Methods: Utilizing a new algorithm that markedly improves the LGN visibility, LGN was evaluated in a group of low vision patients before and after retinal intervention to reinstate vision and normal sighted matched controls. Results: Between and within groups comparisons showed that patients had significantly smaller left (p< 0.0001) and right (p < 0.00002) LGN volumes at baseline as compared to the one-year follow-up volumes. The same baseline and one year comparison in controls was not significant. Significant positive correlations were observed between the incremental volume increase after gene therapy of the left LGN and the incremental increase in the right (r = 0.71, p < 0.02) and left (r = 0.72, p = 0.018) visual fields. Incremental volume increase of the right LGN also showed a similar positive slope but did not reach significance. Discussion: These results show that despite significantly less volume at baseline, retinal gene therapy promotes robust expansion and increase in LGN volume. Reinstating vision may have facilitated the establishment of new connections between the retina and the LGN and/or unmasking of the dormant connections. The exact trajectory of the structural changes taking place in LGN is unclear but our data shows that even after years of low vision, the LGN in RPE65 patients has the potential for plasticity and expansion to a nearly normal volume one year after gene therapy administration.

Indexed as

brain morphometrybrain plasticityimage processinglateral geniculate nucleusretinal gene therapy

Identifiers

PMID36531433
PMCPMC9749418
OpenAlexW4310919942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.