Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531414›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Integrated model for genomic prediction under additive and non-additive genetic architecture.

Neeraj Budhlakoti, Dwijesh Chandra Mishra, Sayanti Guha Majumdar, Anuj Kumar, Sudhir Srivastava, S N Rai, Anil Rai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Neeraj BudhlakotiDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Dwijesh Chandra MishraDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sayanti Guha MajumdarDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Anuj KumarDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sudhir SrivastavaDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
S N RaiBioinformatics and Biostatistics Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States.
Anil RaiDivision of Agricultural Bioinformatics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · INDalhousie University · CAUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using data from genome-wide molecular markers, genomic selection procedures have proved useful for estimating breeding values and phenotypic prediction. The link between an individual genotype and phenotype has been modelled using a number of parametric methods to estimate individual breeding value. It has been observed that parametric methods perform satisfactorily only when the system under study has additive genetic architecture. To capture non-additive (dominance and epistasis) effects, nonparametric approaches have also been developed; however, they typically fall short of capturing additive effects. The idea behind this study is to select the most appropriate model from each parametric and nonparametric category and build an integrated model that can incorporate the best features of both models. It was observed from the results of the current study that GBLUP performed admirably under additive architecture, while SVM's performance in non-additive architecture was found to be encouraging. A robust model for genomic prediction has been developed in light of these findings, which can handle both additive and epistatic effects simultaneously by minimizing their error variance. The developed integrated model has been assessed using standard evaluation measures like predictive ability and error variance.

Indexed as

GBLUPGEBVsk-RCVnonparametricparametricRCVSVM

Identifiers

PMID36531414
PMCPMC9749549
OpenAlexW4310396567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.