Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531381›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Regeneration of non-chimeric plants from DNA-free edited grapevine protoplasts.

Simone Scintilla, Umberto Salvagnin, Lisa Giacomelli, Tieme Zeilmaker, Mickael A Malnoy, Jeroen Rouppe van der Voort, Claudio Moser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CRISPR/Cas system-mediated transgene-free or DNA-free genome editing in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. DNA-free CRISPR genome editing in raspberry (Frontiers in genome editing · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone ScintillaCentro Ricerca ed Innovazione, Fondazione E. Mach. Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Umberto SalvagninCentro Ricerca ed Innovazione, Fondazione E. Mach. Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Lisa GiacomelliCentro Ricerca ed Innovazione, Fondazione E. Mach. Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Tieme ZeilmakerScienza Biotechnologies BV., Enkhuizen, Netherlands.
Mickael A MalnoyCentro Ricerca ed Innovazione, Fondazione E. Mach. Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Jeroen Rouppe van der VoortScienza Biotechnologies BV., Enkhuizen, Netherlands.
Claudio MoserCentro Ricerca ed Innovazione, Fondazione E. Mach. Via E. Mach 1, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITEnza Zaden (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9genome editinggrapevineprotoplastRNPs

Identifiers

PMID36531381
PMCPMC9752144
OpenAlexW4311066017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.