Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531293›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

Caregiver perceptions of the broader societal benefits of vaccination: A path toward sustainable vaccine advocacy in India.

Baldeep K Dhaliwal, Ananya Rattani, Riti Chandrashekhar, David E Bloom, Anita Shet, Rajeev Seth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microbes Saving Lives and Reducing Suffering.Microbial biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baldeep K DhaliwalJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ananya RattaniBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, E-10, Green Park Main, New Delhi, India.
Riti ChandrashekharBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, E-10, Green Park Main, New Delhi, India.
David E BloomHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, USA.
Anita ShetJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rajeev SethBal Umang Drishya Sanstha, E-10, Green Park Main, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade growing public health evidence suggests that, in addition to health-related benefits, there are also social and economic benefits of vaccination. Research to understand how caregivers in low-and-middle-income countries perceive these social and economic benefits, or if these benefits factor into their vaccination decisions for their children, has been limited. Leveraging qualitative strategies to gain more nuanced insights into caregiver perceptions of vaccination benefits has also been significantly underexplored. We conducted in-depth interviews with 13 caregivers of children, at which point we reached saturation, in Mewat District, Haryana, an area in India with low vaccination coverage. Interview results suggest that caregivers of children associate positive health outcomes with vaccination programs, and some additional social and economic benefits beyond improved health outcomes. Caregivers also shared how local advocacy and gaps in vaccination programs can affect their perceptions of vaccination benefits. Qualitatively exploring the perceived benefits provides a unique understanding of the value that caregivers assign to vaccination and complements existing knowledge on factors that dissuade caregivers from vaccination. These insights will allow researchers to better identify and design context-specific advocacy strategies to strengthen vaccination programs in communities with low vaccine uptake and acceptance.

Indexed as

ImmunizationPublic healthQualitativeVaccine advocacyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36531293
PMCPMC9748304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.