Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531256›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2022

Effectiveness of a peanut ball device during labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Pratibha Kamath, Muralidhar Pai, Revathi Shenoy, Sushmitha Karkada, Sonia D'souza, Judith Noronha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07333209 (Determine the Impact of Scheduled Positioning With a Peanutball on Labor Outcomes Among Primiparous Women Under Epidural Analgesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07333209 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Determine the Impact of Scheduled Positioning With a Peanutball on Labor Outcomes Among Primiparous Women Under Epidural Analgesia: A Non-Invasive Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamad Medical CorporationRan2026 to 2026Enrolled110ConditionsLabor (Obstetrics)--ComplicationsArmsScheduled Maternal Positioning with use of peanutball
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pratibha KamathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4673-5104
Muralidhar PaiSikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences(SMIMS),, Sikkim Manipal University(SMU),, Gangtok, Sikkim, India.
Revathi ShenoyDepartment of Biochemistry,, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal,, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-4824
Sushmitha KarkadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-196X
Sonia D'souzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3842-2650
Judith NoronhaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4194-588X
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frequent positional changes and movements during labour is one of the recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) to prevent prolonged labour, thereby avoiding cesarean sections. However, labour induction, continuous fetal monitoring in supine position and immobilising the women during labour are standard practices in most private hospitals. To combat these problems and to implement WHO recommendations, the peanut ball is an effective device through which frequent positional changes will be achieved without disrupting the labour procedures. The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the peanut ball device during labour on maternal and neonatal outcomes and assess the stress response induced by labour in terms of maternal and neonatal cortisol in low-risk primigravid women. The study is a prospective, block randomised controlled trial with parallel arms. A total of 768 study participants will be randomised to the peanut-ball group (intervention) and standard care group (control). The intervention group will receive different peanut ball positions during labour at or after 4 cm of cervical dilatation. The primary outcomes of the study are maternal outcome that includes measurement of duration of the active and the second stage of labour, stress level as measured by serum cortisol level at 3-4 cm and at 10 cm of cervical dilatation, mode of delivery, perception of pain, behavioural response during the active stage of labour and neonatal outcomes, which includes the pattern of fetal heart rate, APGAR score, birth injuries, and umbilical serum and salivary cortisol level. The collected data will be compared between the intervention and control groups.

Indexed as

ArachisFabaceaeCesarean SectionFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneInfant, NewbornLabor, InducedPregnancyProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHydrocortisoneCortisolLabourMaternal and neonatal outcomePeanut ballRandomized controlled trialStressStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID36531256
PMCPMC9727314
OpenAlexW4283711677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.