Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531238›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in genetics2022

Synthetic lethal gene pairs: Experimental approaches and predictive models.

Shan Tang, Birkan Gökbağ, Kunjie Fan, Shuai Shao, Yang Huo, Xue Wu, Lijun Cheng, Lang Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shan TangCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Birkan GökbağDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Kunjie FanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Shuai ShaoCollege of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Yang HuoIndiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Xue WuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lijun ChengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Lang LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality (SL) refers to a genetic interaction in which the simultaneous perturbation of two genes leads to cell or organism death, whereas viability is maintained when only one of the pair is altered. The experimental exploration of these pairs and predictive modeling in computational biology contribute to our understanding of cancer biology and the development of cancer therapies. We extensively reviewed experimental technologies, public data sources, and predictive models in the study of synthetic lethal gene pairs and herein detail biological assumptions, experimental data, statistical models, and computational schemes of various predictive models, speculate regarding their influence on individual sample- and population-based synthetic lethal interactions, discuss the pros and cons of existing SL data and models, and highlight potential research directions in SL discovery.

Indexed as

computational biologygene–gene interactionmachine learning (ML)predictive modelsynthetic lethality

Identifiers

PMID36531238
PMCPMC9751344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.