ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
No causal association between tea consumption and 7 cardiovascular disorders: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tea consumption and cardiovascular risk and outcomes: mechanistic insights, epidemiological evidence, and clinical implications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Association between sphingomyelin levels and gut microbiota abundance in Alzheimer's disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Tea intake and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Metabolism open · 2024Article
- Association between sugar-sweetened beverages and pure fruit juice with risk of six cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- The Application of Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction: Current Status and Future Prospects.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Tea consumption and risk of lung diseases: a two‑sample Mendelian randomization study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.