Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531193›Full record

ArticleCurrent psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)2022

A four-level meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media and well-being: a fresh perspective in the context of COVID-19.

Joax Wong, Poh Xin Yi, Frosch Y X Quek, Verity Y Q Lua, Nadyanna M Majeed, Andree Hartanto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Adolescent Social Media Use through a Self-Determination Theory Lens: A Systematic Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joax WongSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3858-8391
Poh Xin YiSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.
Frosch Y X QuekSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.
Verity Y Q LuaSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.
Nadyanna M MajeedSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.
Andree HartantoSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, Level 4, Singapore, 178903 Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media, one of the most pervasive forms of technology, has been widely studied in relation to the mental health and well-being of individuals. However, the current literature on social media and well-being has provided mixed and inconclusive findings, thus creating a polarizing view of social media. These mixed findings continue to extend into the pandemic, with researchers debating over the effects of social media in the new norms of social isolation. In light of these inconclusive findings, the aim of our meta-analysis was to synthesize previous research data in order to have a holistic understanding of the association between social media and well-being, particularly in the present context of COVID-19. The current meta-analysis systematically investigated 155 effect sizes from 42 samples drawn from 38 studies published during the COVID-19 pandemic (

Indexed as

Covid-19Meta-analysisSocial mediaWell-being

Identifiers

PMID36531193
PMCPMC9748903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.