Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531180›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Measurements on the external load acting on aquatic resistance fins during flexion/extension movements using a robotic joint.

M K Gislason, I T Einarsson, S S Ingvason, J M Saavedra, B Waller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M K GislasonSchool of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
I T EinarssonPhysical Activity, Physical Education, Sport and Health Research Centre (PAPESH), Sports Science Department, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
S S IngvasonSchool of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
J M SaavedraPhysical Activity, Physical Education, Sport and Health Research Centre (PAPESH), Sports Science Department, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.
B WallerPhysical Activity, Physical Education, Sport and Health Research Centre (PAPESH), Sports Science Department, School of Social Sciences, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic resistance training has been proven to be beneficial to many people, in particular those struggling with degenerative joint diseases or recovering from other musculoskeletal issues as the reaction forces acting on the joints become lower, but without compromising the cardiovascular and neuromuscular benefit of the movement. Little has been written on the load produced by or measurements of the devices used in aquatic resistance training. Therefore, uncertainties exist regarding details of how much load can be applied onto the foot when performing the movements and how to quantify progression. In this study, an instrumented robotic arm was designed, built, and used to measure the load acting on the three different types of fins during a simulated flexion/extension movement of a knee. The angular velocities of the knee ranged from 25°/s to 150°/s, which represent the physiological range of

Indexed as

aquatic rehabilitationaquatic resistance trainingbiomechanicsinstrumentationload measurementsrobotic arm

Identifiers

PMID36531180
PMCPMC9755156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.