ReviewSN social sciences2022
Respectful maternity care in the UK using a decolonial lens.
Review in SN social sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A participatory systematic review on human rights and the birth of a child with albinism in sub-Saharan Africa.Women's health (London, England)Pooled it
- Gender-inclusive language in midwifery and perinatal services: A guide and argument for justice.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- From Midwife to Lead Perinatal Practitioner: A Utopian Vision.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Respectful maternity care during childbirth: postnatal women's perspectives. Cross-sectional study from central India: February - December 2023.Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia · 2025Article
- Understanding perinatal vulnerabilities: how Aboriginal women's cultural strengths and resilience shapes their social and emotional wellbeing.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- When midwife continuity of carer is the policy proposal, what is the problem of perinatal health inequalities represented to be?SN social sciences · 2025Review
- Obstetric violence: perspectives from mothers, midwives, and obstetricians.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Patients' perspectives on quality and patient safety failures: lessons learned from an inquiry into transvaginal mesh in Australia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respectful maternity care (RMC) is part of a global movement addressing the previous absence of human rights in global safe maternal care guidance. RMC is grounded in kindness, compassion, dignity and respectful working conditions. The decolonisation movement in healthcare seeks to dismantle structural biases set up from a historically white, male, heteronormative Eurocentric medical system. This article applies a decolonising lens to the RMC agenda and examines barriers to its implementation in UK healthcare systems. Searches of peer-reviewed journals about decolonising maternity care in the UK revealed little. Drawing from wider information bases, we examine power imbalances constructed throughout a history of various colonial biases yet lingering in maternity care. The overarching findings of our analysis revealed 3 areas of focus: professional structures and institutional biases; power imbalances between types of staff and stakeholders of care; and person-centred care through a decolonial lens. To uproot inequity and create fairer and more respectful maternity care for women, birthing people and staff, it is vital that contemporary maternity institutions understand the decolonial perspective. This novel enquiry offers a scaffolding to undertake this process. Due to significant differences in colonial history between Western colonising powers, it is important to decolonise with respect to these different territories, histories and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.