Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531110›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Patterns and predictors of adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations in Alberta's Tomorrow Project.

Olivia K Loewen, Navjot Sandila, Grace Shen-Tu, Jennifer E Vena, Huiming Yang, Kara Patterson, Jian-Yi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia K LoewenAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Navjot SandilaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Grace Shen-TuAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer E VenaAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Huiming YangProvincial Screening Programs, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kara PattersonProvincial Screening Programs, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jian-Yi XuAlberta's Tomorrow Project, Cancer Research and Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer screening is an important prevention component as it can reduce cancer mortality and improve survival. Understanding patterns of adherence to screening recommendations is essential to guide health promotion strategies and policy implementation efforts. The 1999 Alberta screening guidelines were used to determine screening status for eligible female participants in Alberta's Tomorrow Project (n = 4,972), a longitudinal province-based cohort. Screening patterns were derived based on screening status assessed at enrollment (2001-2008) and follow-up (2008-2011). Information on reason for screening was also collected at each time point. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess potential predictors of adherence to screening recommendations. The majority of participants were up-to-date with screening at enrollment (79.3 %), and follow-up (75.2 %). Among all participants, 66.3 % were up-to-date at both time points (considered 'regular screeners'), 8.9 % were not up-to-date or never at enrollment but up-to-date at follow-up (considered 'new screeners'), 21.6 % were not up-to-date at follow-up (considered 'episodic screeners') and 3.2 % had never participated in screening (considered 'non-screeners'). Having a family doctor was the strongest factor associated with being a regular screener (OR (95 % CI): 0.37 (0.24 0.57) when compared with new screeners. Current smokers were more likely to be non-regular screeners. The primary reason for screening was routine screening or age. In conclusions, non-regular screening patterns were more prevalent among women without a family doctor. This finding suggests having a family doctor is an important mechanism to encourage screening. Further work is required to raise awareness of current recommendations and to understand and address reasons for non-adherence.

Indexed as

Alberta’s Tomorrow ProjectBreast cancerCohortMammographyScreening

Identifiers

PMID36531110
PMCPMC9747638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.