Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531109›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Challenges in communicating the benefits of switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes: Responses from eight adult focus groups with varying smoking experience.

Rosemary J Avery, Sahara Byrne, Michael C Dorf, Amelia Greiner Safi, Motasem Kalaji, Alan D Mathios, Jeff Niederdeppe, Norman Porticella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosemary J AveryJeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, United States.
Sahara ByrneDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, United States.
Michael C DorfCornell Law School, Cornell University, United States.
Amelia Greiner SafiDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health & Department of Communication, Cornell University, United States.
Motasem KalajiDepartment of Communication Studies, California State University Northridge, United States.
Alan D MathiosJeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy and Department of Economics, Cornell University, United States.
Jeff NiederdeppeDepartment of Communication and Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, United States.
Norman PorticellaDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, United States.
Cornell University · USCalifornia State University, Northridge · US

Funding

The E-Cigarette Population Paradox: Testing Effects of Youth-Targeted Population Warnings for E-Cigarettes among Two Key PopulationsR01CA246605 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BYRNE, SAHARA ELIZABETH, NIEDERDEPPE, JEFFREY D · 2019 to 2021
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of nuanced messages, described in our study as warnings, that seek to convey the potential benefits of switching from cigarettes to e-cigarettes for adults. The messages were designed to convey the potentially complex idea that e-cigarettes are likely less harmful than combustible cigarettes but that e-cigarettes still present a risk. Eight adult focus groups (N = 37) with varying smoking profiles responded to a set of messages that are used by government agencies and non-government organizations to convey the benefits of switching and ongoing risk associated with e-cigarette use. Results indicate that a suggestion of health benefits from exclusive use of e-cigarettes was met with skepticism from users of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes, and generated confusion about what these benefits were. Messages suggesting that individuals who have switched to e-cigarettes should not switch back to combustible cigarettes elicited the strongest statements of doubt and mistrust among focus group participants, regardless of smoking status. Participants representing all smoking profiles agreed with the message suggesting that switching from combustible cigarettes to e-cigarettes still exposes the user to ongoing health risks. Our focus group discussions suggest that adult smokers may not interpret nuanced messages about harm reduction in a way that will encourage switching behavior.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesFocus groupsHarm-reductionRisk communicationRisk warnings

Identifiers

PMID36531109
PMCPMC9747677
OpenAlexW4309520579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.