ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022
Protective and high-risk social activities associated with homebound status among older adults in rural Japan.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Medical Practices in Awaji Island.JMA journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Becoming homebound can be devastating for older adults in rural communities. This study aimed to identify protective or high-risk social activities associated with homebound status among the rural young old (ages 65-74) and the oldest old (ages ≥ 75). We used data from a survey of older adults in a rural community of Japan in 2014. Questions covered sociodemographic characteristics, homebound status (i.e., going out less than once a week), physical and psychological status, and social activities. Using survey data, we conducted logistic regression analysis to identify protective and high-risk social activities associated with homebound status. Of the 1,564 participants, 51.0 % were the oldest old, and the mean age was 75.2 (±7.0) years. The prevalence of homebound status was 10.5 % total: 5.2 % among the young old and 15.7 % among the oldest old and highest among the female oldest old (19.4 %). The main protective social activity for the young and the oldest old was visiting friends' houses (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.64-17.64 and AOR 3.49, 95 % CI 1.07-11.42, respectively). For the young old, specific high-risk social activities were advising family and friends (AOR 0.07, 95 % CI 0.01-0.62) and activities to support older adults (AOR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.03-0.84). For the oldest old, a protective social activity was participating in long-term care prevention programs (AOR 28.94, 95 % CI 1.90-441.63). To prevent rural older adults from becoming homebound, support should be provided according to protective and high-risk social activities for age groups, with particular attention to safe socialization amid the threat of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.