Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531105›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Factors associated with the accurate self-report of cancer screening behaviors among women living in the rural Midwest region of the United States.

Mira L Katz, Timothy E Stump, Patrick O Monahan, Brent Emerson, Ryan Baltic, Gregory S Young, J Madison Hyer, Electra D Paskett, Victoria L Champion, Susan M Rawl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Accuracy of Self-Reported Cervical Screening Status Among Pregnant Women.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mira L KatzCollege of Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Timothy E StumpDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Patrick O MonahanIndiana University, Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Brent EmersonCollege of Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Ryan BalticComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Gregory S YoungCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
J Madison HyerComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Electra D PaskettCollege of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Victoria L ChampionSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Susan M RawlSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
The Ohio State University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Health · US

Funding

Unfolded Protein Response and Autophagy in T Helper Cell Effector FunctionP20GM121176 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Monica Rosas Lemus · 2017 to 2026
$24.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the accuracy of the self-report of up-to-date cancer screening behaviors (Mammography, Papanicolaou (Pap)/Human Papillomavirus (HPV) tests, Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT)/Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), Colonoscopy) compared to medical record documentation prior to eligibility determination and enrollment in a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase cancer screening among women living in rural counties of Indiana and Ohio. Women (n = 1,641) completed surveys and returned a medical record release form from November 2016-June 2019. We compared self-report to medical records for up-to-date cancer screening behaviors to determine the validity of self-report. Logistic regression models identified variables associated with accurate reporting. Women were up-to-date for mammography (75 %), Pap/HPV test (54 %), colonoscopy (53 %), and FOBT/FIT (6 %) by medical record. Although 39.6 % of women reported being up-to-date for all three anatomic sites (breast, cervix, and colon), only 31.8 % were up to date by medical records. Correlates of accurate reporting of up-to-date cancer screening varied by screening test. Approximately-one-third of women in rural counties in the Midwest are up-to-date for all three anatomic sites and correlates of the accurate reporting of screening varied by test. Although most investigators use medical records to verify completion of cancer screening behaviors as the primary outcome of intervention trials, they do not usually use medical records for the routine verification of study eligibility. Study results suggest that future research should use medical record documentation of cancer screening behaviors to determine eligibility for trials evaluating interventions to increase cancer screening.

Indexed as

Cancer Screening TestsColonoscopyMammographyPapanicolaou TestRural HealthWomen’s Health

Identifiers

PMID36531105
PMCPMC9747628
OpenAlexW4309495340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.