Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531077›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Safety and feasibility assessment of extending the flushing interval in totally implantable venous access port flushing during the non-treatment stage for patients with breast cancer.

Yinhuan Wang, Hao Tian, Xianchun Chen, Jiasi Zhang, Li Wang, Haiyan Fan, Yi Zhang, Xiaowei Qi, Shaoyi Hu, Ying Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Clinical Practice and Quality Control Guidelines for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients (2024)].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yinhuan WangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hao TianDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xianchun ChenDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jiasi ZhangDepartment of Hematology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li WangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haiyan FanDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaowei QiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shaoyi HuDepartment of Nursing, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ying YangDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the safety and feasibility of extending the flushing interval for the totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) during the non-treatment stage in patients with breast cancer (BC) by retrospectively analyzing the patients' clinical data, including the incidence of TIVAP-related complications. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients with BC who underwent TIVAP implantation at our hospital between January 2018 and March 2021 during their non-treatment phase and visited the hospital regularly for TIVAP flushing. Among the 1013 patients with BC who received TIVAP implantation, 617 patients were finally included on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into three groups according to the length of the flushing interval: group 1 (≤30 days, n = 79), group 2 (31-90 days, n = 66), and group 3 (91-120 days, n = 472). The basic characteristics of patients in each group and the incidence of TIVAP-related complications (catheter obstruction, infection, and thrombosis) were analyzed. Results: No significant intergroup differences were observed in age, body mass index (BMI), tumor stage, pathological staging, implantation approach, chemotherapy regimen, duration of treatment, and TIVAP-related blood return rate (P > 0.05). Among patients from all three groups, 11 cases of catheter pump-back without blood and eight cases of TIVAP-related complications such as infection, thrombosis, and catheter obstruction were recorded. However, no significant differences in TIVAP-related complications were observed among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Extending the TIVAP flushing interval beyond three months during the non-treatment stage in BC patients is safe and feasible and did not increase the incidence of TIVAP-related complications.

Indexed as

breast cancercatheter obstructionflushing intervalinfectionthrombosistotally implantable venous access port

Identifiers

PMID36531077
PMCPMC9755344
OpenAlexW4311093079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.