ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Deep learning model for diagnosing early gastric cancer using preoperative computed tomography images.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Deep Learning for Renal Mass Characterization in Challenging Cases: A Comparative Study of Spatial-Input Strategies and a Validated ROI-Only DLR Nomogram.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Multiscale Spatial Fusion Feature-Driven Characterization of Gastric Cancer Invasive Margins: A Multicenter Cohort Study for Preoperative Accurate Differentiation Between T4a and T4b Subtypes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Review
- Development of a deep learning model for T1N0 gastric cancer diagnosis using 2.5D radiomic data in preoperative CT images.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Correlation between Tomographic and Histopathological Staging in Upfront Resected Gastric Cancer: Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in the Era of Perioperative Therapy.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Deep learning and radiomics for gastric cancer serosal invasion: automated segmentation and multi-machine learning from two centers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- CT-based deep learning model for predicting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- Global progress and future prospects of early gastric cancer screening.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastric Cancer Imaging With Emphasis on Diagnostic Imaging and Body Morphometry.Journal of gastric cancer · 2023Review
- CT-based radiomics nomogram for overall survival prediction in patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Development of a deep learning model for early gastric cancer diagnosis using preoperative computed tomography images.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early gastric cancer (EGC) is defined as a lesion restricted to the mucosa or submucosa, independent of size or evidence of regional lymph node metastases. Although computed tomography (CT) is the main technique for determining the stage of gastric cancer (GC), the accuracy of CT for determining tumor invasion of EGC was still unsatisfactory by radiologists. In this research, we attempted to construct an AI model to discriminate EGC in portal venous phase CT images. Methods: We retrospectively collected 658 GC patients from the first affiliated hospital of Nanchang university, and divided them into training and internal validation cohorts with a ratio of 8:2. As the external validation cohort, 93 GC patients were recruited from the second affiliated hospital of Soochow university. We developed several prediction models based on various convolutional neural networks, and compared their predictive performance. Results: The deep learning model based on the ResNet101 neural network represented sufficient discrimination of EGC. In two validation cohorts, the areas under the curves (AUCs) for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.993 (95% CI: 0.984-1.000) and 0.968 (95% CI: 0.935-1.000), respectively, and the accuracy was 0.946 and 0.914. Additionally, the deep learning model can also differentiate between mucosa and submucosa tumors of EGC. Conclusions: These results suggested that deep learning classifiers have the potential to be used as a screening tool for EGC, which is crucial in the individualized treatment of EGC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.