ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Multicenter, prospective feasibility study of Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ technology for the treatment of both nodular and superficial low-risk basal cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04918381 (A Multicenter, Prospective, Treat and Resect Feasibility Study of the CellFX System for the Treatment of Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Prospective, Treat and Resect Feasibility Study of the CellFX System for the Treatment of Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Lesions
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic nanorobots in oncology: From targeted drug delivery to smart theranostic systems.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nanosecond Electric Pulses as a Novel In Situ Vaccination Strategy for Cancer Treatment: Mechanisms, Challenges and Prospects.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Increases the Susceptibility of Human A549 Cells to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nano-Pulse Stimulation Therapy in Oncology.Bioelectricity · 2024Review
- Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) on a Multicellular Spheroid Tumor Model: Influence of Pulse Duration, Pulse Repetition Rate, Absorbed Energy, and Temperature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Nano-pulse stimulation™ therapy (NPS™) is superior to cryoablation in clearing murine melanoma tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ (NPS™) therapy is a new, non-thermal bioelectric modality that applies ultrashort pulses of electric energy to trigger regulated cell death (RCD) in treated tissues. Instead of initiating necrosis by heating or freezing, NPS therapy permeabilizes intracellular organelles to activate the cell's own self-destruct pathway of programmed or regulated cell death. Unlike cryotherapeutic procedures that can both damage structural tissues and diffuse into the periphery beyond the margins of the lesion, NPS therapy only affects cells within the treated zone leaving surrounding tissue and acellular components unaffected. Methods: In this study we treated 37 basal cell carcinoma lesions on 30 subjects (NCT04918381). The treated lesions were photographed on 3-, 7-, 14-, 30- and 60-days after treatment. All subjects then underwent surgical excision for histological examination of the treated tissue. Results: 92% of the BCC lesions (34 of 37) showed complete histological clearance of BCC. Histologic analysis of the 3 cases where residual BCC was noted indicated that full energy coverage was not achieved, which could be remedied with an improved treatment guide to standardize and optimize the CellFX Conclusion: The CellFX procedure was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of low-risk nodular and superficial BCC lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.