Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531070›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Multicenter, prospective feasibility study of Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ technology for the treatment of both nodular and superficial low-risk basal cell carcinoma.

Amy S Ross, Todd Schlesinger, Christopher B Harmon, Ronald L Moy, Thomas E Rohrer, Darius R Mehregan, Richard Nuccitelli, Lauren Jauregui Johnston, William A Knape

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04918381 (A Multicenter, Prospective, Treat and Resect Feasibility Study of the CellFX System for the Treatment of Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04918381 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicenter, Prospective, Treat and Resect Feasibility Study of the CellFX System for the Treatment of Low-Risk Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Lesions

TypeinterventionalSponsorPulse Biosciences, Inc.Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsBCC - Basal Cell Carcinoma, BCC, Excision MarginArmsCellFX System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy S RossPHDermatology, Clearwater, FL, United States.
Todd SchlesingerClinical Research Center of the Carolinas, Charleston, SC, United States.
Christopher B HarmonSurgical Dermatology Group, Vestavia Hills, AL, United States.
Ronald L MoyRonald L. Moy Fincher Chipps Facial Plastics/Dermatology, Beverly Hills, CA, United States.
Thomas E RohrerSkincare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA, United States.
Darius R MehreganDepartment of Dermatology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Richard NuccitelliClinical Studies Dept., Pulse Biosciences, Inc., Hayward, CA, United States.
Lauren Jauregui JohnstonClinical Studies Dept., Pulse Biosciences, Inc., Hayward, CA, United States.
William A KnapeClinical Studies Dept., Pulse Biosciences, Inc., Hayward, CA, United States.
Pulse Biosciences (United States) · USChestnut Hill College · USMoy, Fincher, Chipps Medical Group · USWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nano-Pulse Stimulation™ (NPS™) therapy is a new, non-thermal bioelectric modality that applies ultrashort pulses of electric energy to trigger regulated cell death (RCD) in treated tissues. Instead of initiating necrosis by heating or freezing, NPS therapy permeabilizes intracellular organelles to activate the cell's own self-destruct pathway of programmed or regulated cell death. Unlike cryotherapeutic procedures that can both damage structural tissues and diffuse into the periphery beyond the margins of the lesion, NPS therapy only affects cells within the treated zone leaving surrounding tissue and acellular components unaffected. Methods: In this study we treated 37 basal cell carcinoma lesions on 30 subjects (NCT04918381). The treated lesions were photographed on 3-, 7-, 14-, 30- and 60-days after treatment. All subjects then underwent surgical excision for histological examination of the treated tissue. Results: 92% of the BCC lesions (34 of 37) showed complete histological clearance of BCC. Histologic analysis of the 3 cases where residual BCC was noted indicated that full energy coverage was not achieved, which could be remedied with an improved treatment guide to standardize and optimize the CellFX Conclusion: The CellFX procedure was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of low-risk nodular and superficial BCC lesions.

Indexed as

basal cell carcinomaBCClow-risk BCCNano-Pulse StimulationNano-Pulse Stimulation therapynodular BCCregulated cell deathsuperficial BCC

Identifiers

PMID36531070
PMCPMC9755735
OpenAlexW4311111426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.