Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36531003›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Germline and somatic variants in ovarian carcinoma: A next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis.

Angeliki Andrikopoulou, Eleni Zografos, Kleoniki Apostolidou, Anastasios Kyriazoglou, Alksistis-Maria Papatheodoridi, Maria Kaparelou, Konstantinos Koutsoukos, Michalis Liontos, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, Flora Zagouri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. RareOncology letters · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angeliki AndrikopoulouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eleni ZografosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Kleoniki ApostolidouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anastasios KyriazoglouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alksistis-Maria PapatheodoridiDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria KaparelouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos KoutsoukosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Michalis LiontosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Meletios-Athanasios DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Flora ZagouriDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAlexandra Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Germline BRCA1/2 mutations are identified in 13-15% of ovarian cancers, while an additional 5-7% of ovarian cancers harbor somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. Beyond these mutations, germline or somatic aberrations in genes of the homologous recombination (HR) pathway such as Methods: We performed NGS analysis in 86 patients with ovarian cancer treated in the Oncology Department of Alexandra University Hospital in order to identify the molecular landscape of germline and somatic mutations in ovarian cancer. Results: The genes with the highest number of pathogenic somatic mutations in high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) patients were TP53 [68%; 34/50] and BRCA1 [22%; 11/50] followed by somatic mutations in RB1 [2%; 1/50], NF1 [2%; 1/50], BRCA2 [2%; 1/50], AKT1 [2%; 1/50], RAD50 [2%; 1/50], PIK3CA [2%; 1/50] genes. Of note, the most common TP53 genetic polymorphism was c.524G>A p.Arg175His in exon 5. Variants of unknown significance (VUS) detected in HGSC included ROS1 [26%; 13/50], RAD50 [6%; 3/50], BRCA2 [6%; 3/50], NOTCH1 [6%; 3/50], TP53 [6%; 3/50], AR [6%; 3/50]. As for germline mutations, BRCA1 [8/30; 27%] and BRCA2 [4/30; 13%] were the most common genes bearing pathogenic alterations in HGSC, while VUS germline mutations commonly affected HRR-related genes, including ATM (c.7816A>G), BRIP (c.2327 C>A), CHEK2 (c.320-5T>A). Conclusion: Overall, genetic testing should be offered in most patients with ovarian cancer to identify mutations in HRR genes and determine the population that would be susceptible to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.

Indexed as

BRCAgermline mutationsHRDnext-generation sequencingNGSovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID36531003
PMCPMC9754718
OpenAlexW4311065887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.