Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Identification of a novel gene signature of lung adenocarcinoma based on epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance.

E Zhou, Feng Wu, Mengfei Guo, Zhengrong Yin, Yumei Li, Minglei Li, Hui Xia, Jingjing Deng, Guanghai Yang, Yang Jin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Feng WuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mengfei GuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhengrong YinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yumei LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Minglei LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hui XiaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jingjing DengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Guanghai YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yang JinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Hubei Province Clinical Research Center for Major Respiratory Diseases, Key Laboratory of Pulmonary Diseases of National Health Commission, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are commonly administered to EGFR-positive lung cancer patients. However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs (mostly gefitinib and erlotinib) is presently a significant problem. Limited studies have focused on an EGFR-TKI resistance-related gene signature (ERS) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Methods: Gefitinib and erlotinib resistance-related genes were obtained through the differential analyses of three Gene Expression Omnibus datasets. These genes were investigated further in LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Patients in the TCGA-LUAD cohort were split into two groups: one for training and one for testing. The training cohort was used to build the ERS, and the testing cohort was used to test it. GO and KEGG analyses were explored for the enriched pathways between the high-risk and low-risk groups. Various software, mainly CIBERSORT and ssGSEA, were used for immune infiltration profiles. Somatic mutation and drug sensitivity analyses were also explored. Results: An ERS based on five genes (FGD3, PCDH7, DEPDC1B, SATB2, and S100P) was constructed and validated using the TCGA-LUAD cohort, resulting in the significant stratification of LUAD patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed that ERS had an independent prognostic value in LUAD. The pathway enrichment analyses showed that most of the genes that were different between the two risk groups were related to the immune system. Further immune infiltration results revealed that a lower immune infiltration score was observed in high-risk patients, and that various leukocytes were significantly related to the ERS. Importantly, samples from the high-risk group showed lower levels of PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4, which are important biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. Patients in the high-risk group also had more gene mutation changes and were more sensitive to chemotherapy drugs like docetaxel and sorafenib. The ERS was also validated in the GSE30219, GSE11969 and GSE72094, and showed a favorable prognostic value for LUAD patients. Discussion: The ERS established during this study was able to predict a poor prognosis for LUAD patients and had great potential for predicting drug responses.

Indexed as

drug sensitivityepidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistanceimmune microenvironmentlung adenocarcinomaprognostic signature

Identifiers

PMID36530971
PMCPMC9751970
OpenAlexW4311082151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.