Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530950›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex communications2022

Local networks from different parts of the human cerebral cortex generate and share the same population dynamic.

Alex Willumsen, Jens Midtgaard, Bo Jespersen, Christoffer K K Hansen, Salina N Lam, Sabine Hansen, Ron Kupers, Martin E Fabricius, Minna Litman, Lars Pinborg and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why is everyone talking about brain state?Trends in neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  2. How far neuroscience is from understanding brains.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alex WillumsenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens MidtgaardDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo JespersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoffer K K HansenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Salina N LamDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sabine HansenDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ron KupersDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin E FabriciusDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Minna LitmanEpilepsy Clinic, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars PinborgEpilepsy Clinic, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
José D Tascón-VidarteDIKU, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne SabersEpilepsy Clinic, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per E RolandDepartment of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-8115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of neuroscience is to reveal mechanisms supporting collaborative actions of neurons in local and larger-scale networks. However, no clear overall principle of operation has emerged despite decades-long experimental efforts. Here, we used an unbiased method to extract and identify the dynamics of local postsynaptic network states contained in the cortical field potential. Field potentials were recorded by depth electrodes targeting a wide selection of cortical regions during spontaneous activities, and sensory, motor, and cognitive experimental tasks. Despite different architectures and different activities, all local cortical networks generated the same type of dynamic confined to one region only of state space. Surprisingly, within this region, state trajectories expanded and contracted continuously during all brain activities and generated a single expansion followed by a contraction in a single trial

Indexed as

attractor propertiesbrain theorycortical dynamicsfluctuations and oscillationssingle trials

Identifiers

PMID36530950
PMCPMC9753090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.