Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530858›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Outcomes of Biosynthetic and Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair.

Dharshan Sivaraj, Katharina S Fischer, Trudy S Kim, Kellen Chen, Seth S Tigchelaar, Artem A Trotsyuk, Geoffrey C Gurtner, Gordon K Lee, Dominic Henn, Rahim S Nazerali

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dharshan SivarajDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Katharina S FischerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Trudy S KimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Kellen ChenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Seth S TigchelaarDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Artem A TrotsyukDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Geoffrey C GurtnerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Gordon K LeeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Dominic HennDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.
Rahim S NazeraliDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of mesh for reinforcement of ventral hernia repair (VHR) led to a significant reduction in hernia recurrence rates. However, it remains controversial whether synthetic or biologic mesh leads to superior outcomes. Recently, hybrid mesh consisting of reinforced biosynthetic ovine rumen (RBOR) has been developed and aims to combine the advantages of biologic and synthetic mesh; however, outcomes after VHR with RBOR have not yet been compared with the standard of care. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on 109 patients, who underwent VHR with RBOR (n = 50) or synthetic polypropylene mesh (n = 59). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed and compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to assess associations of mesh type with overall complications and surgical site occurrence (SSO). Results: Patients who underwent VHR with RBOR were older (mean age 63.7 versus 58.8 years, Conclusion: Compared with synthetic polypropylene mesh, the use of RBOR for VHR mitigates SSO while maintaining low hernia recurrence rates at 30-month follow-up.

Identifiers

PMID36530858
PMCPMC9746774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.