Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530797›Full record

ArticleJournal of aerosol science2022

Impact of washing cycles on the performances of face masks.

Augustin Charvet, Nathalie Bardin-Monnier, Dominique Thomas, Olivier Dufaud, Marielle Pfrimmer, Mathieu Barrault, Soleiman Bourrous, Victor Mocho, François-Xavier Ouf, Stéphane Poirier and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Can disposable masks be worn more than once?Ecotoxicology and environmental safety · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Augustin CharvetUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Nathalie Bardin-MonnierUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Dominique ThomasUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Olivier DufaudUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Marielle PfrimmerUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, LRGP, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Mathieu BarraultInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCA, Gif-Sur-Yvette, 91192, France.
Soleiman BourrousInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCA, Gif-Sur-Yvette, 91192, France.
Victor MochoInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCA, Gif-Sur-Yvette, 91192, France.
François-Xavier OufInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCA, Gif-Sur-Yvette, 91192, France.
Stéphane PoirierInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-RES, SCA, Gif-Sur-Yvette, 91192, France.
Laurence JeanmichelCETELOR, Université de Lorraine, F-88000, Épinal, France.
César SegoviaCETELOR, Université de Lorraine, F-88000, Épinal, France.
Daniel FerryAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CINaM, F-13009, Marseille, France.
Olivier GraubyAix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CINaM, F-13009, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tension on the supply of surgical and FFP2 masks during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic leads to study the potential reuse of these masks. As washing is easily adaptable at home, this treatment solution was retained. In this work, thirty-six references of surgical masks and four FFP2 masks were tested without being worn or washed and after several washing cycles. The results highlighted a great heterogeneity of performances depending on the mask trademarks, both for surgical masks and FFP2. The quality of the meltblown and spunbond layers and the presence/absence of electrostatic charges at the fiber surface are put forward to explain the variability of results, both on differential pressures and filtration efficiencies. The differential pressure and the particle filtration efficiency of the washed masks were maintained up to 10 washing cycles and met the standard requirements. However, an immersion in water with a detergent induces an efficiency decrease for submicronic particles. This lower performance, constant after the first washing cycle, can be explained by the loss of electrostatic charges during the washing cycle. The modifications of surface properties after washing also lead to a loss of the hydrophobic behavior of type IIR surgical masks, which can therefore no more be considered as resistant to blood projections.

Indexed as

Electrostatic chargeFFP2ReuseSurgical masksWashing

Identifiers

PMID36530797
PMCPMC9749850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.