ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2022
Monocyte or white blood cell counts and β
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploratory Analysis of Practical Predictive Indices for the Efficacy of Mogamulizumab in Patients With Aggressive Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma.Hematological oncology · 2025Trial
- Outcomes of elranatamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: prognostic impact of monocyte count, MyCARe, and R2-ISS.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts the efficacy of isatuximab plus pomalidomide in multiple myeloma patients.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Pretreatment blast-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker for CD19/CD3-bispecific T cell-engaging antibodies (blinatumomab) treatment against relapsed or refractory B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Daratumumab is one of the most widely used treatments for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, not all patients achieve a lasting therapeutic response with daratumumab. Objectives: We hypothesized that a durable response to daratumumab could be predicted by the balance between the MM tumor burden and host immune status. Design: We conducted a retrospective study using the real-world data in the Kansai Myeloma Forum (KMF) database. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 324 relapsed/refractory MM patients who were treated with daratumumab in the KMF database. Results: In this study, 196 patients were treated with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DLd) regimen and 128 patients were treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DBd) regimen. The median age at treatment, number of prior treatment regimens and time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) were 68, 4 and 8.02 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that the TTNT under the DLd regimen was longer with either higher monocyte counts (analysis 1), higher white blood cell (WBC) counts (analysis 2), lower β Conclusion: We propose a simple scoring model to predict a durable effect of the DLd regimen by classifying patients into three categories based on either monocyte counts (0 points for ⩾200/μl; 1 point for <200/μl) or WBC counts (0 points for ⩾3500/μl; 1 point for <3500/μl) plus B2MG (0 points for <5.5 mg/L; 1 point for ⩾5.5 mg/L). Patients with a score of 0 showed significantly longer TTNT and significantly better survival compared to those with a score of 1 or 2 (both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.