Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530746›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2022

A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation of the experiences of men diagnosed with chronic lymphoedema.

Garry R Cooper-Stanton, Nicola Gale, Manbinder Sidhu, Kerry Allen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Garry R Cooper-StantonDoctoral Researcher/Lecturer, Health Services Management, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-8665
Nicola GaleProfessor, Health Services Management, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Manbinder SidhuResearch Fellow, Health Services Management, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kerry AllenSenior Lecturer, Health Services Management, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymphoedema is a chronic condition that is estimated to affect up to four people per 1000 of the UK population with this increasing with age. Men account for up to 20% of lymphoedema service caseloads with research focussing upon women affected. Aims: To retrieve primary qualitative research on the experiences of men with chronic lymphoedema. Methods: A qualitative review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) meta-aggregation method. A search strategy was applied to 12 databases, from inception to February 2021, with 22 studies identified and appraised. The findings were extracted and synthesised via the JBI approach. Results: Four synthesised findings were identified: (1) The 'New Norm', how diagnosis led to men being faced with a 'new version' of themselves; (2) 'Journey into the Unknown' relates to the unforeseen diagnosis of the condition; (3) 'Access' - challenge in receiving a diagnosis, and support; and (4) 'Personhood' - the impact of the condition upon external constructs and relationships. Conclusions: Men are faced with similar challenges as women coupled with societal expectations with respect to gender identity and expression. This leads to those wishing to engage with men to adopt 'gender-based tailoring' within healthcare services, information and support.

Indexed as

chroniclymphoedemamennarrativeoedemaqualitative

Identifiers

PMID36530746
PMCPMC9755568
OpenAlexW4296785393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.