ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Longitudinal changes in functional connectivity in speech motor networks in apraxia of speech after stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms associated with tDCS as an adjuvant to shortened phonomotor treatment in chronic post-stroke aphasia.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Diagnosing Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults When There Is No Gold Standard: A Scoping Review About the Diagnostic Process.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
- The Functional Capacity of the Upper Airway in Older Adults with Chronic Stroke.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The cerebral substrates of apraxia of speech (AOS) recovery remain unclear. Resting state fMRI post stroke can inform on altered functional connectivity (FC) within cortical language networks. Some initial studies report reduced FC between bilateral premotor cortices in patients with AOS, with lowest FC in patients with the most severe AOS. However, longitudinal FC studies in stroke are lacking. The aims of the present longitudinal study in early post stroke patients with AOS were (i) to compare connectivity strength in AOS patients to that in left hemisphere (LH) lesioned stroke patients without a speech-language impairment, (ii) to investigate the relation between FC and severity of AOS, aphasia and non-verbal oral apraxia (NVOA) and (iii) to investigate longitudinal changes in FC, from the subacute phase to the chronic phase to identify predictors of AOS recovery. Methods: Functional connectivity measures and comprehensive speech-language assessments were obtained at 4 weeks and 6 months after stroke in nine patients with AOS after a LH stroke and in six LH lesioned stroke patients without speech-language impairment. Functional connectivity was investigated in a network for speech production: inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior insula (aINS), and ventral premotor cortex (vPMC), all bilaterally to investigate signs of adaptive or maladaptive changes in both hemispheres. Results: Interhemispheric vPMC connectivity was significantly reduced in patients with AOS compared to LH lesioned patients without speech-language impairment. At 6 months, the AOS severity was associated with interhemispheric aINS and vPMC connectivity. Longitudinal changes in FC were found in individuals, whereas no significant longitudinal change in FC was found at the group level. Degree of longitudinal AOS recovery was strongly associated with interhemispheric IFG connectivity strength at 4 weeks. Conclusion: Early interhemispheric IFG connectivity may be a strong predictor of AOS recovery. The results support the importance of interhemispheric vPMC connection in speech motor planning and severity of AOS and suggest that also bilateral aINS connectivity may have an impact on AOS severity. These findings need to be validated in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.