Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530574›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

Evaluation of Anthropometric Measurements of the Aspect Ratio of Knee in Indian Population and its Correlation with the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty System.

John Mukhopadhaya, Andalib Kashani, Nishikant Kumar, Janki S Bhadani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John MukhopadhayaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.
Andalib KashaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.
Nishikant KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.
Janki S BhadaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most of the commercially available TKR implants are designed for western populations, which are known to have larger build and stature compared to Asian counterparts often leading to mismatch between resected bony surfaces and implant components. There is paucity of morphometric data of distal femur and proximal tibia in the Indian population. Thus, it becomes important to obtain anthropometric data to achieve the best stability and long-term success of implant. Materials and Methods: Intraoperative morphological measurements of 100 knees (59 female and 41 males) were done using vernier calliper during TKR. The anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) dimensions of cross-section of the femur and tibia were noted before bony resection. The aspect ratios were calculated and compared with that of implant used (DePuy, Stryker, Maxx). Results: We have found that Indian males have larger dimensions of distal femur as well as proximal tibia than females. There exists some degree of mismatch in patients' dimensions and the sizes of all the three commercially available implant system as well their aspect ratios. Conclusion: Specific designing of implants with dimensions in accordance with the morphometric measurements of Indian population should be done. Also gender specific implant designing should be done.

Indexed as

Anthropometric measurementArthroplastyAspect ratioCalliperDePuyMaxxMismatchStrykerTKR

Identifiers

PMID36530574
PMCPMC9741755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.