Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530493›Full record

ArticleApplied research in quality of life2023

Neo-humanism and COVID-19: Opportunities for a socially and environmentally sustainable world.

Francesco Sarracino, Kelsey J O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied research in quality of life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco SarracinoInstitut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg (STATEC Research), and GLO Fellow, Global Labor Organization. 14, rue Erasme, L-2013 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Kelsey J O'ConnorInstitut national de la statistique et des études économiques du Grand-Duché du Luxembourg (STATEC Research), GLO Fellow, Global Labor Organization (GLO), Research Affiliate, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), and Senior Research Associate, School of Economics, University of Johannesburg. 14, rue Erasme, L-2013 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of crises, culminating with COVID-19, shows that going "Beyond GDP" is urgently necessary. Social and environmental degradation are consequences of emphasizing GDP as a measure of progress. This degradation created the conditions for the COVID-19 pandemic and limited the efficacy of counter-measures. Additionally, rich countries did not fare much better during the pandemic than poor ones. COVID-19 thrived on inequalities and lack of cooperation. In this article, we leverage on defensive growth theory to explain the relationships between these factors, and we put forward the idea of neo-humanism, a cultural movement grounded on evidence from quality-of-life studies. The movement proposes a new culture leading towards a socially and environmentally sustainable future. Specifically, neo-humanism suggests that prioritizing well-being by, for instance promoting social relations, would benefit the environment, and enable collective action to address public issues. This, in turn, would positively affect productivity and health - among other behavioral outcomes - and thereby instill a virtuous cycle. Such a society would have been better endowed to cope with COVID-19, and possibly even prevented the pandemic. Neo-humanism proposes a world in which the well-being of people comes before the well-being of markets, in which promoting cooperation and social relations represents the starting point for better lives, and a peaceful and respectful coexistence with other species on Earth.

Indexed as

Beyond GDPCOVID-19Defensive growthEconomic growthEnvironmental degradationNeo-humanismQuality of lifeSocial capitalSubjective well-beingSustainability

Identifiers

PMID36530493
PMCPMC9735221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.