Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530415›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

A manikin or human simulator-development of a tool for measuring students' perception.

Kamil Torres, Phillip Evans, Izabela Mamcarz, Natalia Radczuk, Anna Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kamil TorresChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Phillip EvansChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Izabela MamcarzChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Natalia RadczukChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Anna TorresChair and Department of Didactics and Medical Simulation, Medical University of Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Education with the use of medical simulation may involve the use of two modalities: manikins or standardized patients (SPs) to meet specific learning objectives. We have collected students' opinions about the two modalities which can be helpful in planning and evaluating the curriculum process. Although reviews or comparisons of student opinions appear in the literature, it is difficult to find a scale that would be based on a comparison of specific effects that can be obtained in the educational process. In order to fill this gap, an attempt was made to construct a questionnaire. Methods: An experimental version of a questionnaire measuring the final-year students' (273) opinions about the effectiveness of both simulation techniques has been designed on the basis of semi-structured interviews. They were conducted with 14 final-year students excluded from the subsequently analyzed cohort. The scale has been completed, tested and validated. Results: The authors developed a 33-statement questionnaire which contain two scales: teaching medicine with the manikins and with the SPs. Two factors were identified for each scale: Doctor-patient relationship and practical aspects. The scales can be used complementary or separately, as the article reports independent statistics for each scale. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the manikin scale is 0.721 and for the SP scale is 0.758. Conclusions: The questionnaire may be applied to medical students to identify their opinions about using manikins and SPs in teaching. It may have an important impact for planning curriculum and implementing particular modalities in accordance with the intended learning objectives.

Indexed as

ManikinsStudents, MedicalHumansLearningPerceptionPhysician-Patient RelationsCurriculum designManikinMedical educationSimulation environmentStandardized patientUndergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID36530415
PMCPMC9753758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.