Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530406›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Predicting RNA secondary structure by a neural network: what features may be learned?

Elizaveta I Grigorashvili, Zoe S Chervontseva, Mikhail S Gelfand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizaveta I Grigorashvili *Center of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Zoe S Chervontseva *Institute of Information Transmission Problems, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandCenter of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is a class of machine learning techniques capable of creating internal representation of data without explicit preprogramming. Hence, in addition to practical applications, it is of interest to analyze what features of biological data may be learned by such models. Here, we describe PredPair, a deep learning neural network trained to predict base pairs in RNA structure from sequence alone, without any incorporated prior knowledge, such as the stacking energies or possible spatial structures. PredPair learned the Watson-Crick and wobble base-pairing rules and created an internal representation of the stacking energies and helices. Application to independent experimental (DMS-Seq) data on nucleotide accessibility in mRNA showed that the nucleotides predicted as paired indeed tend to be involved in the RNA structure. The performance of the constructed model was comparable with the state-of-the-art method based on the thermodynamic approach, but with a higher false positives rate. On the other hand, it successfully predicted pseudoknots. t-SNE clusters of embeddings of RNA sequences created by PredPair tend to contain embeddings from particular Rfam families, supporting the predictions of PredPair being in line with biological classification.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRNABase PairingHumansMachine LearningNucleotidesNucleotidesRNANeural networksRepresentation learningRNA secondary structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID36530406
PMCPMC9756865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.