ArticlePeerJ2022
Predicting RNA secondary structure by a neural network: what features may be learned?
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Deep Learning in RNA Therapeutic Development.ACS nano · 2026Review
- Enhanced RNA secondary structure prediction through integrative deep learning and structural context analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning is a class of machine learning techniques capable of creating internal representation of data without explicit preprogramming. Hence, in addition to practical applications, it is of interest to analyze what features of biological data may be learned by such models. Here, we describe PredPair, a deep learning neural network trained to predict base pairs in RNA structure from sequence alone, without any incorporated prior knowledge, such as the stacking energies or possible spatial structures. PredPair learned the Watson-Crick and wobble base-pairing rules and created an internal representation of the stacking energies and helices. Application to independent experimental (DMS-Seq) data on nucleotide accessibility in mRNA showed that the nucleotides predicted as paired indeed tend to be involved in the RNA structure. The performance of the constructed model was comparable with the state-of-the-art method based on the thermodynamic approach, but with a higher false positives rate. On the other hand, it successfully predicted pseudoknots. t-SNE clusters of embeddings of RNA sequences created by PredPair tend to contain embeddings from particular Rfam families, supporting the predictions of PredPair being in line with biological classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.