Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530365›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2023

Trajectories of psychological distress over multiple COVID-19 lockdowns in Australia.

Ferdi Botha, Richard W Morris, Peter Butterworth, Nick Glozier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ferdi BothaMelbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, The University of Melbourne, & ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, Australia.
Richard W MorrisCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, & School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, & ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, Australia.
Peter ButterworthMelbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research, The University of Melbourne, & National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Australia.
Nick GlozierCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, & ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUAustralian National University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic, including the indirect effect of policy responses, on psychological distress has been the subject of much research. However, there has been little consideration of how the prevalence of psychological distress changed with the duration and repetition of lockdowns, or the rate of resolution of psychological distress once lockdowns ended. This study describes the trajectories of psychological distress over multiple lockdowns during the first two years of the pandemic across five Australian states for the period May 2020 to December 2021 and examines whether psychological distress trajectories varied as a function of time spent in lockdown, or time since lockdown ended. A total of

Indexed as

AnxietyAustraliaCOVID-19DepressionMental healthTrajectories

Identifiers

PMID36530365
PMCPMC9742066
OpenAlexW4312094589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.