Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530344›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Tissue harvest with a laser microbiopsy.

Jason B King, Nitesh Katta, Sapun H Parekh, Thomas E Milner, James W Tunnell

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason B KingThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3866-7420
Nitesh KattaUniversity of California Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Sapun H ParekhThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8522-1854
Thomas E MilnerUniversity of California Irvine, Beckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
James W TunnellThe University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States.

Funding

Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Traditional pathology workflow suffers from limitations including biopsy invasiveness, small fraction of large tissue samples being analyzed, and complex and time-consuming processing. Aim: We address limitations of conventional pathology workflow through development of a laser microbiopsy device for minimally invasive harvest of sub-microliter tissue volumes. Laser microbiopsy combined with rapid diagnostic methods, such as virtual hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) imaging has potential to provide rapid minimally invasive tissue diagnosis. Approach: Laser microbiopsies were harvested using an annular shaped Ho:YAG laser beam focused onto the tissue surface. As the annulus was ablated, the tissue section in the center of the annulus was ejected and collected directly onto a glass slide for analysis. Cryogen spray cooling was used before and after laser harvest to limit thermal damage. Microbiopsies were collected from porcine skin and kidney. Harvested microbiopsies were imaged with confocal microscopy and digitally false colored to provide virtual H&E images. Results: Microbiopsies were successfully harvested from porcine skin and kidney. Computational and experimental results show the benefit of cryogen pre- and post-cooling to limit thermal damage. Virtual H&E images of microbiopsies retained observable cellular features including cell nuclei. Conclusions: Laser microbiopsy with virtual H&E imaging shows promise as a potential rapid and minimally invasive tool for biopsy and diagnosis.

Indexed as

BiopsyLasers, Solid-StateAnimalsMicroscopy, ConfocalSwinelaser ablationmicrobiopsyminimally invasivevirtual hematoxylin and eosin

Identifiers

PMID36530344
PMCPMC9749420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.