Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530224›Full record

ReviewACS omega2022

Review on Liquid-Liquid Separation by Membrane Filtration.

Swathi Divakar, Mahesh Padaki, R Geetha Balakrishna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swathi DivakarCentre for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Jain Global Campus, Kanakapura, Ramanagara, Bangalore562112, India.
Mahesh PadakiCentre for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Jain Global Campus, Kanakapura, Ramanagara, Bangalore562112, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-9369
R Geetha BalakrishnaCentre for Nano and Material Sciences, Jain University, Jain Global Campus, Kanakapura, Ramanagara, Bangalore562112, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7247-4921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-liquid separation is crucial in the present circumstances. Substitution of the conventional types of separation like distillation and pervaporation is mandatory due to the high energy requirement of the two. The separation of organic mixtures has a huge potential in industries such as pharmaceutical, fine chemicals, fuels, textile, papers, and fertilizers. Membrane-affiliated separations are one of the prime techniques for liquid-liquid separations. Organic solvent nanofiltration, solvent-resistant nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration are a few methods through which organic liquid-liquid separation can be attained. Implementation of such a technology in chemical industries reduces the time consumption and is cost efficient. Even though a lot of research has been done, attention is needed in the field of organic-liquid separation aided by membranes. In this review, various membranes used for organic mixture separations such as polar-nonpolar, polar-polar, and nonpolar-nonpolar are discussed with a focus on membrane materials, additives, separation theory, separation type, experimental setup, fouling mitigation, surface modification, and major challenges. The review also offers insights and probable solutions for existing problems and also discusses the scope of research to be undertaken in the future.

Identifiers

PMID36530224
PMCPMC9753544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.