Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530203›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Bibliometric and visual analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation in the web of science database from 2000 to 2022

Weiming Sun, JingJing Song, Xiangli Dong, Xizhen Kang, Binjun He, Wentao Zhao, Zhaoting Li, Zhen Feng, Xiuping Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Bibliometric Analysis of Brain Stimulation Technologies in Sleep Disorders.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weiming SunDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
JingJing SongJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiangli DongJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xizhen KangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Binjun HeSchool of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Wentao ZhaoThe Third Clinical Department, China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Zhaoting LiSchool of Life Science, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Zhen FengDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Xiuping ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the current research hotspots and development tendency of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in the field of neurobiology from a bibliometric perspective by providing visualized information to scientists and clinicians. Materials and methods: Publications related to tDCS published between 2000 and 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) on May 5, 2022. Bibliometric features including the number of publications and citations, citation frequency, H-index, journal impact factors, and journal citation reports were summarized using Microsoft Office Excel. Co-authorship, citation, co-citation, and co-occurrence analyses among countries, institutions, authors, co-authors, journals, publications, references, and keywords were analyzed and visualized using CiteSpace (version 6.1.R3). Results: A total of 4,756 publications on tDCS fulfilled the criteria we designed and then were extracted from the WOSCC. The United States (1,190 publications, 25.02%) and Harvard University (185 publications, 3.89%) were the leading contributors among all the countries and institutions, respectively. NITSCHE MA and FREGNI F, two key researchers, have made great achievements in tDCS. Conclusion: This was the first-ever study of peer-reviewed publications relative to tDCS using several scientometric and visual analytic methods to quantitatively and qualitatively reveal the current research status and trends in the field of tDCS. Through the bibliometric method, we gained an in-depth understanding of the current research status and development trend on tDCS. Our research and analysis results might provide some practical sources for academic scholars and clinicians.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysisCiteSpaceresearch trendstranscranial direct current stimulationweb of scienceweb of science transcranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36530203
PMCPMC9751488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.