Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530026›Full record

ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Regulatory utility of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to support alternative bioequivalence approaches and risk assessment: A workshop summary report.

Fang Wu, Youssef Mousa, Kimberly Raines, Chris Bode, Yu Chung Tsang, Rodrigo Cristofoletti, Hongling Zhang, Tycho Heimbach, Lanyan Fang, Filippos Kesisoglou and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Model-informed drug discovery and development approaches to inform clinical trial design and regulatory decisions: A primer for the MENA region.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Fang WuOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Youssef MousaOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Kimberly RainesOffice of New Drug Products (ONDP), Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ), CDER, U.S. FDA, Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Chris BodeAbsorption Systems LLC, Pennsylvania, Eaton, USA.
Yu Chung TsangApotex Inc., Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Rodrigo CristofolettiUniversity of Florida, Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Hongling ZhangOffice of Bioequivalence, OGD, CDER, U.S. FDA, Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Tycho HeimbachMerck & Co., Inc., New Jersey, Rahway, USA.
Lanyan FangOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Filippos KesisoglouMerck & Co., Inc., New Jersey, Rahway, USA.
Amitava MitraJanssen Research & Development, New Jersey, Raritan, USA.
James PolliUniversity of Maryland, Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4314
Myong-Jin KimOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Jianghong FanOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, CDER, U.S. FDA, Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Banu S ZolnikOffice of New Drug Products (ONDP), Office of Pharmaceutical Quality (OPQ), CDER, U.S. FDA, Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Duxin SunUniversity of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Yi ZhangOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.
Liang ZhaoOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Maryland, Silver Spring, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report summarizes the proceedings for day 2 sessions 1 and 3 of the 2-day public workshop entitled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches," a jointly sponsored workshop by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG). The aims of this workshop were: (1) to discuss how mechanistic modeling, including physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation, can support product development, and regulatory submissions; (2) to share the current state of mechanistic modeling for bioequivalence (BE) assessment through case studies; (3) to establish a consensus on best practices for using PBPK modeling for BE assessment to help drive further investment by the generic drug industry into mechanistic modeling and simulation; and (4) to introduce the concept of a Model Master File to improve model-sharing. The theme of day 2 covered PBPK absorption model for oral products as an alternative BE approach and a tool for supporting risk assessment and biowaiver (session 1), oral PBPK for evaluating the impact of food on BE (session 2), successful cases, and challenges for oral PBPK (session 3). This report summarizes the topics of the presentations of day 2 sessions 1 and session 3 from FDA, academia, and pharmaceutical industry, including the current status of oral PBPK, case examples as well as the challenges and opportunities in this area. In addition, panel discussions on the utility of oral PBPK in both new drugs and generic drugs from regulatory and industry perspective are also summarized.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalResearch ReportComputer SimulationHumansTherapeutic Equivalency

Identifiers

PMID36530026
PMCPMC10196428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.