Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530013›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures.

Elizabete Pumpure, Dārta Jakovicka, Ilaria Mariani, Agnija Vaska, Benedetta Covi, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Gita Jansone-Šantare, Anna Regīna Knoka, Katrīna Paula Vilcāne, Dace Rezeberga and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04847336 (IMAGINE EURO), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04847336 unknown statusnot on this map

IMAGINE EURO (Improving MAternal Newborn carE In the EURO Region): Maternal and Newborn Health Service Preparedness, Quality and Resilience, Among Countries of the WHO European Region, During the COVID-19 Pandemic

TypeobservationalSponsorWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, TriesteRan2020 to 2022Enrolled10,000ConditionsQuality of Care During ChildbirthArmsNo intervention is planned
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. IMAgiNE EURO: Data for action on quality of maternal and newborn care in 20 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  5. Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabete PumpureDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-6430
Dārta JakovickaFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1119-7366
Ilaria MarianiWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4788
Agnija VaskaRiga Maternity Hospital, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-9379
Benedetta CoviWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-0654
Emanuelle Pessa ValenteWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-4628
Gita Jansone-ŠantareDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-433X
Anna Regīna KnokaFaculty of Medicine, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8234-9307
Katrīna Paula VilcāneFaculty of Public Health and Social Welfare, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0500-3791
Dace RezebergaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6287-7017
Marzia LazzeriniWHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-2198
IMAgiNE EURO study group
Riga Stradiņš University · LVIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · IT

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Health, Rome - Italy, in collaboration with the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste - Italy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia, comparing the years 2020 and 2021, among women who went into labor or had a prelabor cesarean.

methodsWomen giving birth in healthcare facilities in Latvia from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed to compare QMNC in 2020 and 2021.

results2079 women were included in the analysis: 1860 women who went into labor (group 1) and 219 with prelabor cesarean (group 2). Among group 1, 66.4% (n = 99/149) of women received fundal pressure in an instrumental vaginal birth, 43.5% (n = 810) lacked involvement in choices, 17.4% (n = 317) reported suffering abuse, 32.7% (n = 609) reported inadequate breastfeeding support while 5.2% (n = 96) lack of early breastfeeding. A significant reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 29.5% (n = 219) and 25.0% (n = 270) of respondents in 2020 and 2021, respectively (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses highlighted a significantly lower QMNC index for 2020 compared with 2021 (P < 0.001).

conclusionThis first study investigating QMNC in Latvia showed significant gaps in QMNC perceived by respondents, with slightly better results in 2021. Appropriate healthcare strategies to improve health care for women and newborns in Latvia are required. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier:NCT04847336.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLatviaPandemicsParturitionPregnancyQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareWorld Health OrganizationchildbirthCOVID-19Eastern EuropeIMAgiNE EUROLatviamaternity carenewborn carequality of care

Identifiers

PMID36530013
PMCPMC9878132
OpenAlexW4312058519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.