Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36530005›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards.

Claire de Labrusse, Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger, Ilaria Mariani, Anouck Pfund, Michael Gemperle, Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin, Antonia N Mueller, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Benedetta Covi, Marzia Lazzerini and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire de LabrusseSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-5135
Alessia Abderhalden-ZellwegerSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1984-6105
Ilaria MarianiWHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4788
Anouck PfundSchool of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael GemperleResearch Institute for Midwifery, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-9734
Susanne Grylka-BaeschlinResearch Institute for Midwifery, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-6886
Antonia N MuellerResearch Institute for Midwifery, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-8567
Emanuelle Pessa ValenteWHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-4628
Benedetta CoviWHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-0654
Marzia LazzeriniWHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-2198
IMAgiNE EURO study group
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

IMAgiNE EURO project was supported by the Ministry of Health, Rome - Italy, in collaboration with the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste - Italy. This study was supported by the School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland and the Research Institute for Midwifery, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in healthcare facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland.

methodsWomen giving birth in Switzerland answered a validated online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. QMNC score was calculated according to linguistic region and mode of birth. Differences were assessed using logistic regression analysis adjusting for relevant variables.

resultsA total of 1175 women were included in the analysis. Limitations in QMNC during the pandemic were reported by 328 (27.9%) women. Several quality measures, such as deficient communication (18.0%, n = 212), insufficient number of healthcare professionals (19.7%, n = 231), no information on the newborn after cesarean (26.5%, n = 91) or maternal and newborn danger signs (34.1%, n = 401 and 41.4% n = 487, respectively) suggested preventable gaps in QMNC. Quality measures significantly differed by linguistic region and mode of birth. Multivariate analysis established a significantly lower QMNC for women in French- and Italian-speaking regions compared with the German-speaking region. Moreover, in several quality indicators reflecting communication with healthcare providers, women who did not answer the questionnaire in one of the Swiss national languages had significantly worse scores than others. A significant lower QMNC was also found for young and primiparous women and for those who experienced cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth.

conclusionWomen giving birth in Switzerland during the pandemic reported notable gaps in QMNC. Providers should be attuned to women who are younger, primiparous, and those who had an emergency cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth given the lower QMNC reported by these groups. Women who did not respond in a Swiss national language may need improved communication strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancySwitzerlandWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19IMAgiNE EUROmaternal healthmaternity servicesmode of birthquality of careSwitzerlandWHO standards

Identifiers

PMID36530005
PMCPMC9877813
OpenAlexW4311874424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.