ReviewExpert review of proteomics
Proteomic repository data submission, dissemination, and reuse: key messages.
Review in Expert review of proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics integration of proteomics and metabolomics in pediatric health and disease.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Leveraging Advanced AI Frameworks for Dual PPAR α/γ Agonist Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Translational opportunities in aptamer and nanobody lateral flow assays within the WHO REASSURED framework.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Review
- Changes in the Proteome and Phosphoproteome ofProteomes · 2026Article
- Review
- Blood proteomics: insights from public data.Genome biology · 2026Review
- The evolution of analytical techniques for multiplex analysis of protein biomarkers.Expert review of proteomics · 2025Review
- The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe creation of ProteomeXchange data workflows in 2012 transformed the field of proteomics, consisting of the standardization of data submission and dissemination and enabling the widespread reanalysis of public MS proteomics data worldwide. ProteomeXchange has triggered a growing trend toward public dissemination of proteomics data, facilitating the assessment, reuse, comparative analyses, and extraction of new findings from public datasets. By 2022, the consortium is integrated by PRIDE, PeptideAtlas, MassIVE, jPOST, iProX, and Panorama Public. AREAS COVERED: Here, we review and discuss the current ecosystem of resources, guidelines, and file formats for proteomics data dissemination and reanalysis. Special attention is drawn to new exciting quantitative and post-translational modification-oriented resources. The challenges and future directions on data depositions including the lack of metadata and cloud-based and high-performance software solutions for fast and reproducible reanalysis of the available data are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The success of ProteomeXchange and the amount of proteomics data available in the public domain have triggered the creation and/or growth of other protein knowledgebase resources. Data reuse is a leading, active, and evolving field; supporting the creation of new formats, tools, and workflows to rediscover and reshape the public proteomics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.