Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529792›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2022

Expression dynamics of periodic transcripts during cancer cell cycle progression and their correlation with anticancer drug sensitivity.

Chun-Xiao Li, Jin-Song Wang, Wen-Na Wang, Dong-Kui Xu, Yan-Tong Zhou, Fang-Zhou Sun, Yi-Qun Li, Feng-Zhu Guo, Jia-Lu Ma, Xue-Yan Zhang and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Melatonin: A Silver Bullet for Fertility and Reproductive Health.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Chemical Composition and Anti-Lung Cancer Activities ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chun-Xiao Li *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jin-Song Wang *State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Wen-Na Wang *Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Dong-Kui Xu *Department of VIP, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yan-Tong ZhouState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Fang-Zhou SunState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yi-Qun LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Feng-Zhu GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jia-Lu MaState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xue-Yan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Meng-Jiao ChangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Bing-He XuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. xubinghe@medmail.com.cn.
Fei MaState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. drmafei@126.com.
Hai-Li QianState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. qianhaili001@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0652-4801
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cell cycle is at the center of cellular activities and is orchestrated by complex regulatory mechanisms, among which transcriptional regulation is one of the most important components. Alternative splicing dramatically expands the regulatory network by producing transcript isoforms of genes to exquisitely control the cell cycle. However, the patterns of transcript isoform expression in the cell cycle are unclear. Therapies targeting cell cycle checkpoints are commonly used as anticancer therapies, but none of them have been designed or evaluated at the alternative splicing transcript level. The utility of these transcripts as markers of cell cycle-related drug sensitivity is still unknown, and studies on the expression patterns of cell cycle-targeting drug-related transcripts are also rare.

methodsTo explore alternative splicing patterns during cell cycle progression, we performed sequential transcriptomic assays following cell cycle synchronization in colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell lines, using flow cytometry and reference cell cycle transcripts to confirm the cell cycle phases of samples, and we developed a new algorithm to describe the periodic patterns of transcripts fluctuating during the cell cycle. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) drug sensitivity datasets and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) transcript datasets were used to assess the correlation of genes and their transcript isoforms with drug sensitivity. We identified transcripts associated with typical drugs targeting cell cycle by determining correlation coefficients. Cytotoxicity assays were used to confirm the effect of ENST00000257904 against cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Finally, alternative splicing transcripts associated with mitotic (M) phase arrest were analyzed using an RNA synthesis inhibition assay and transcriptome analysis.

resultsWe established high-resolution transcriptome datasets of synchronized cell cycle samples from colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. The results of the cell cycle assessment showed that 43,326, 41,578 and 29,244 transcripts were found to be periodically expressed in HeLa, HCT116 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively, among which 1280 transcripts showed this expression pattern in all three cancer cell lines. Drug sensitivity assessments showed that a large number of these transcripts displayed a higher correlation with drug sensitivity than their corresponding genes. Cell cycle-related drug screening showed that the level of the CDK4 transcript ENST00000547281 was more significantly associated with the resistance of cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors than the level of the CDK4 reference transcript ENST00000257904. The transcriptional inhibition assay following M phase arrest further confirmed the M-phase-specific expression of the splicing transcripts. Combined with the cell cycle-related drug screening, the results also showed that a set of periodic transcripts, for example, ENST00000314392 (a dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2 isoform transcript), was more associated with drug sensitivity than the levels of their corresponding gene transcripts.

conclusionsIn summary, we identified a panel of cell cycle-related periodic transcripts and found that the levels of transcripts of drug target genes showed different values for predicting drug sensitivity, providing novel insights into alternative splicing-related drug development and evaluation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsCell CycleCell DivisionCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansProtein IsoformsAntineoplastic AgentsProtein IsoformsAlternative splicingCell cycleCyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitorDolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2Drug resistanceTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID36529792
PMCPMC9762028
OpenAlexW4312065867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.