Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529761›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Mental healthcare-seeking behavior of women in Bangladesh: content analysis of a social media platform.

Kamrun Nahar Koly, Zarin Tasnim, Sharmin Ahmed, Jobaida Saba, Rudbar Mahmood, Faria Tasnim Farin, Sabrina Choudhury, Mir Nabila Ashraf, M Tasdik Hasan, Ibidunni Oloniniyi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kamrun Nahar KolyHealth System and Population Studies Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh. koly@icddrb.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2466-8139
Zarin TasnimBRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, 1213, Bangladesh.
Sharmin AhmedDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Jobaida SabaHealth System and Population Studies Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rudbar MahmoodDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Faria Tasnim FarinDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sabrina ChoudhuryDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mir Nabila AshrafDepartment of Public Health, North South University, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
M Tasdik HasanAction Lab, Department of Human Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ibidunni OloniniyiDepartmental of Mental Health, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Rifath Binta ModasserSchool of Public Health, Independent University Bangladesh (IUB), Bashundhara, Dhaka, 1229, Bangladesh.
Daniel D ReidpathJeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health remains a highly stigmatized area of healthcare, and people often conceal their concerns rather than seek assistance or treatment. The Women Support Initiative Forum (WSIF) is a social media platform established in 2018 to provide expert and peer-led psychosocial support services to women of all ages in Bangladesh. The anonymous nature of the forum means that mental health concerns can be aired without fear of identification.

methodA content analysis was conducted on the anonymous posts retrieved from the WSIF platform between 8

resultThe 1006 posts generated four themes and nine sub-themes. All the women mentioned mental health symptoms (n = 1006; 100%). Most also mentioned reasons for seeking mental healthcare (n = 818; 81.31%), healthcare-seeking behavior (n = 667; 66.30%), and barriers to seeking mental healthcare (n = 552; 54.87%). The majority of women described symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety-like symptoms, which were aggregated under common mental health conditions. Mental health symptoms were ascribed to various external influences, including marital relationship, intrafamilial abuse, and insecurities related to the COVID-19 pandemic. A large proportion of posts were related to women seeking information about mental healthcare services and service providers (psychologists or psychiatrists). The analysis found that most women did not obtain mental healthcare services despite their externalized mental health symptoms. The posts identified clear barriers to women accessing mental health services, including low mental health literacy, the stigma associated with mental healthcare-seeking behavior, and the poor availability of mental health care services.

conclusionThe study revealed that raising mass awareness and designing culturally acceptable evidence-based interventions with multisectoral collaborations are crucial to ensuring better mental healthcare coverage for women in Bangladesh.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental Health ServicesSocial MediaBangladeshFemaleHumansPandemicsBangladeshBarriersHealthcare-seeking behaviorMental healthSocial mediaWomen

Identifiers

PMID36529761
PMCPMC9760542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.