Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529755›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

BCM3D 2.0: accurate segmentation of single bacterial cells in dense biofilms using computationally generated intermediate image representations.

Ji Zhang, Yibo Wang, Eric D Donarski, Tanjin T Toma, Madeline T Miles, Scott T Acton, Andreas Gahlmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How to study biofilms: technological advancements in clinical biofilm research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ji Zhang *Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Yibo Wang *Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Eric D DonarskiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tanjin T TomaDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Madeline T MilesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Scott T ActonDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Andreas GahlmannDepartment of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. agahlmann@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-6787
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Non-Invasive Single-Cell Morphometry and Tracking in Living Bacterial BiofilmsR01GM139002 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI GAHLMANN, ANDREAS · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and segmentation of single cells in three-dimensional (3D) fluorescence time-lapse images is essential for observing individual cell behaviors in large bacterial communities called biofilms. Recent progress in machine-learning-based image analysis is providing this capability with ever-increasing accuracy. Leveraging the capabilities of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), we recently developed bacterial cell morphometry in 3D (BCM3D), an integrated image analysis pipeline that combines deep learning with conventional image analysis to detect and segment single biofilm-dwelling cells in 3D fluorescence images. While the first release of BCM3D (BCM3D 1.0) achieved state-of-the-art 3D bacterial cell segmentation accuracies, low signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) and images of very dense biofilms remained challenging. Here, we present BCM3D 2.0 to address this challenge. BCM3D 2.0 is entirely complementary to the approach utilized in BCM3D 1.0. Instead of training CNNs to perform voxel classification, we trained CNNs to translate 3D fluorescence images into intermediate 3D image representations that are, when combined appropriately, more amenable to conventional mathematical image processing than a single experimental image. Using this approach, improved segmentation results are obtained even for very low SBRs and/or high cell density biofilm images. The improved cell segmentation accuracies in turn enable improved accuracies of tracking individual cells through 3D space and time. This capability opens the door to investigating time-dependent phenomena in bacterial biofilms at the cellular level.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerBacteriaBiofilmsImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID36529755
PMCPMC9760640
OpenAlexW4311834556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.