Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36529722›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2022

Dental caries at enamel and dentine level among European adolescents - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marit S Skeie, Abhijit Sen, Göran Dahllöf, Tone Natland Fagerhaug, Hedda Høvik, Kristin S Klock

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dental caries in childhood cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marit S Skeie *Department of Clinical Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, The Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, 5009, Bergen, Norway. marit.skeie@uib.no.
Abhijit Sen *Center for Oral Health Services and Research, Mid-Norway (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
Göran DahllöfCenter for Oral Health Services and Research, Mid-Norway (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
Tone Natland FagerhaugCenter for Oral Health Services and Research, Mid-Norway (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
Hedda HøvikCenter for Oral Health Services and Research, Mid-Norway (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
Kristin S KlockDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, Pediatric Dentistry, The Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, 5009, Bergen, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOKarolinska Institutet · SEStatistics Norway · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn contrast with the last century, caries epidemiology has begun integrating enamel caries into determinations of caries prevalence and experience. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the caries status including estimations of enamel caries, of European adolescents.

methodFour databases (Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL, and SweMed+) were systematically searched from 1 January 2000 through 20 September 2021 for peer-reviewed publications on caries prevalence and caries experience in 12-19-year-olds; that also included evaluations of enamel lesions. Summary estimates were calculated using random effect model.

resultsOverall, 30 publications were selected for the systematic review covering 25 observational studies. Not all studies could be used in the meta-analyses. Caries prevalence was 77% (n = 22 studies). Highest prevalence was reported in the age groups 16-19 years, and in studies where caries examinations were done before 2010. The overall mean DMFT score was 5.93 (n = 14 studies) and it was significantly lower among Scandinavian adolescents than among other European adolescents (4.43 vs. 8.89). The proportion of enamel caries (n = 7 studies) was 50%, and highest in the lowest age group (12-15 years). Results from the present systematic review reflected the caries distribution to be skewed at individual-, tooth- and surface levels; at tooth and surface level, also changed according to age.

conclusionsAlthough studies in which the caries examinations had been done in 2010 or later documented a reduction in caries prevalence, caries during adolescence still constitutes a burden. Thus, the potential for preventing development of more severe caries lesions, as seen in the substantial volume of enamel caries during early adolescence, should be fully exploited. For this to happen, enamel caries should be a part of epidemiological reporting in national registers.

Indexed as

Dental CariesAdolescentAdultChildDental EnamelDentinEuropean PeopleHumansPrevalenceYoung AdultAdolescentCaries experienceCaries prevalenceEpidemiology

Identifiers

PMID36529722
PMCPMC9762106
OpenAlexW4312114622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.